talk to sun-in-shadow怎么过啊？卡在这里了。请大神指点！【上古卷轴ol吧】_百度贴吧
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&签到排名：今日本吧第个签到，本吧因你更精彩，明天继续来努力！
本吧签到人数：0可签7级以上的吧50个
本月漏签0次！成为超级会员，赠送8张补签卡连续签到：天&&累计签到：天超级会员单次开通12个月以上，赠送连续签到卡3张
关注：35,871贴子：
talk to sun-in-shadow怎么过啊？卡在这里了。请大神指点！
找不到这个NPC！
2018最新上古ol正式官方入口「龙武2」新版首测!非RMB首选网游!装备100%靠打!上古ol新版,超低配置要求,爽快游戏体验!2018良心网游大作,限量礼包,火热领取中!
换张地图再回来，门口我也卡过。
点亮12星座印记,
我也卡这了，这是bug，官方论坛很多老外都在说，就是夏慕岛更新后才出现的，听说下个补丁修复。
从更新后出现了好多新问题，希望会慢慢修复。
贴吧热议榜
使用签名档&&
保存至快速回贴翻译English中文(简体)DanskNederlandsFran?aisDeutschItaliano日本語???PortuguêsРусскийEspa?olTürk?e
最近的帖子
被删除的恶意软件的安全网站?
1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
下载作业帮安装包
扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
He is in Beijing No 10 High school为什么这里用in不用at,at不是加小地点吗?
作业帮用户
扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
一楼没理解清楚,二楼则完全误导了.前置词（即介词）的使用取决于它放在什么名词前面.school前面用in,跟地方大小没关系.如在更小的房间里,也得用in啊.当然,就城镇而言,大城市前用in,如in Beijing,而小城镇前用at,如at...
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
扫描下载二维码ASP.NET | The ASP.NET Site
Get building
ASP.NET is an open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET. ASP.NET creates websites based on HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript that are simple, fast, and can scale to millions of users.
Free, powerful IDE for ASP.NET on Windows
Free .NET command-line tools for Windows, Mac, and Linux
Free courses
Start learning ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core for free with videos, interactive tutorials, code samples and more.
Watch the weekly ASP.NET Community Standup for live demos, Q&A, roadmap information and more..NET Conf is a free, 3 day virtual developer event co-organized by the .NET community and Microsoft.Aug 15, 2018Gunnar Peipman deploys a Blazor application as a Azure static website on Azure Storage, and uses Azure Functions as a server back-end for Blazor application hosted as a static site.Aug 14, 2018Burke Holland shares favorite VS Code extensions from the Azure team.Aug 13, 2018David Pine interviews Steve Sanderson for his take on WebAssembly.Aug 10, 2018Rick Strahl takes a deep dive into Blazor.Aug 9, 2018Tomasz Peczek extends his series on WebHooks by looking at binding the parameters.Aug 8, 2018Filip Wojcieszyn introduces a consistent, centralized way of handling exceptions and request validation in an ASP.NET Core web application.
AnnouncementsReconciliation - ReactReconciliationReact provides a declarative API so that you don’t have to worry about exactly what changes on every update. This makes writing applications a lot easier, but it might not be obvious how this is implemented within React. This article explains the choices we made in React’s “diffing” algorithm so that component updates are predictable while being fast enough for high-performance apps.
Motivation
When you use React, at a single point in time you can think of the render() function as creating a tree of React elements. On the next state or props update, that render() function will return a different tree of React elements. React then needs to figure out how to efficiently update the UI to match the most recent tree.
There are some generic solutions to this algorithmic problem of generating the minimum number of operations to transform one tree into another. However, the
have a complexity in the order of O(n3) where n is the number of elements in the tree.
If we used this in React, displaying 1000 elements would require in the order of one billion comparisons. This is far too expensive. Instead, React implements a heuristic O(n) algorithm based on two assumptions:
Two elements of different types will produce different trees.
The developer can hint at which child elements may be stable across different renders with a key prop.
In practice, these assumptions are valid for almost all practical use cases.
The Diffing Algorithm
When diffing two trees, React first compares the two root elements. The behavior is different depending on the types of the root elements.
Elements Of Different Types
Whenever the root elements have different types, React will tear down the old tree and build the new tree from scratch. Going from &a& to &img&, or from &Article& to &Comment&, or from &Button& to &div& - any of those will lead to a full rebuild.
When tearing down a tree, old DOM nodes are destroyed. Component instances receive componentWillUnmount(). When building up a new tree, new DOM nodes are inserted into the DOM. Component instances receive componentWillMount() and then componentDidMount(). Any state associated with the old tree is lost.
Any components below the root will also get unmounted and have their state destroyed. For example, when diffing:
Counter />
Counter />
This will destroy the old Counter and remount a new one.
DOM Elements Of The Same Type
When comparing two React DOM elements of the same type, React looks at the attributes of both, keeps the same underlying DOM node, and only updates the changed attributes. For example:
div className="before" title="stuff" />
div className="after" title="stuff" />
By comparing these two elements, React knows to only modify the className on the underlying DOM node.
When updating style, React also knows to update only the properties that changed. For example:
div style={{color: 'red', fontWeight: 'bold'}} />
div style={{color: 'green', fontWeight: 'bold'}} />
When converting between these two elements, React knows to only modify the color style, not the fontWeight.
After handling the DOM node, React then recurses on the children.
Component Elements Of The Same Type
When a component updates, the instance stays the same, so that state is maintained across renders. React updates the props of the underlying component instance to match the new element, and calls componentWillReceiveProps() and componentWillUpdate() on the underlying instance.
Next, the render() method is called and the diff algorithm recurses on the previous result and the new result.
Recursing On Children
By default, when recursing on the children of a DOM node, React just iterates over both lists of children at the same time and generates a mutation whenever there’s a difference.
For example, when adding an element at the end of the children, converting between these two trees works well:
li>firstli>
li>secondli>
li>firstli>
li>secondli>
li>thirdli>
React will match the two &li&first&/li& trees, match the two &li&second&/li& trees, and then insert the &li&third&/li& tree.
If you implement it naively, inserting an element at the beginning has worse performance. For example, converting between these two trees works poorly:
li>Dukeli>
li>Villanovali>
li>Connecticutli>
li>Dukeli>
li>Villanovali>
React will mutate every child instead of realizing it can keep the &li&Duke&/li& and &li&Villanova&/li& subtrees intact. This inefficiency can be a problem.
In order to solve this issue, React supports a key attribute. When children have keys, React uses the key to match children in the original tree with children in the subsequent tree. For example, adding a key to our inefficient example above can make the tree conversion efficient:
li key="2015">Dukeli>
li key="2016">Villanovali>
li key="2014">Connecticutli>
li key="2015">Dukeli>
li key="2016">Villanovali>
Now React knows that the element with key '2014' is the new one, and the elements with the keys '2015' and '2016' have just moved.
In practice, finding a key is usually not hard. The element you are going to display may already have a unique ID, so the key can just come from your data:
li key={item.id}>{item.name}li>
When that’s not the case, you can add a new ID property to your model or hash some parts of the content to generate a key. The key only has to be unique among its siblings, not globally unique.
As a last resort, you can pass an item’s index in the array as a key. This can work well if the items are never reordered, but reorders will be slow.
Reorders can also cause issues with component state when indexes are used as keys. Component instances are updated and reused based on their key. If the key is an index, moving an item changes it. As a result, component state for things like uncontrolled inputs can get mixed up and updated in unexpected ways.
is an example of the issues that can be caused by using indexes as keys on CodePen, and
is a updated version of the same example showing how not using indexes as keys will fix these reordering, sorting, and prepending issues.
It is important to remember that the reconciliation algorithm is an implementation detail. React could rerender the whole the end result would be the same. Just to be clear, rerender in this context means calling render for all components, it doesn’t mean React will unmount and remount them. It will only apply the differences following the rules stated in the previous sections.
We are regularly refining the heuristics in order to make common use cases faster. In the current implementation, you can express the fact that a subtree has been moved amongst its siblings, but you cannot tell that it has moved somewhere else. The algorithm will rerender that full subtree.
Because React relies on heuristics, if the assumptions behind them are not met, performance will suffer.
The algorithm will not try to match subtrees of different component types. If you see yourself alternating between two component types with very similar output, you may want to make it the same type. In practice, we haven’t found this to be an issue.
Keys should be stable, predictable, and unique. Unstable keys (like those produced by Math.random()) will cause many component instances and DOM nodes to be unnecessarily recreated, which can cause performance degradation and lost state in child components.
InstallationMain ConceptsAdvanced GuidesAPI ReferenceContributingFAQDocsChannelsCommunityMoreCopyright (C) 2018 Facebook Inc.}