辛普森一家英文对白_百度作业帮
辛普森一家英文对白
辛普森一家英文对白
《辛普森一家》精彩对白：[from trailer] Announcer: [shows a Superman logo on a blue background] In 2007, leaping his way onto the silver screen, the greatest hero in American history. Homer Simpson: 57 [camera zooms out to show Homer in a Superman shirt and underwear] fca [timidly] Homer Simpson: I forgot what I was supposed to say! Announcer: The Simpsons Movie. Opening worldwide July 27, 2007. Homer Simpson: Uh oh! We better get started! Montgomery Burns: [in background] Excellent. [from trailer] Lisa Simpson: Ladders! They've got ladders! [from trailer] Homer Simpson: [woozily] This film is not yet rated. [from trailer] [Homer is whipping his dogs] Homer Simpson: Run! Run! Homer Simpson: Jump! Jump! Homer Simpson: Rest! Rest! Homer Simpson: I know we've had a rough day, but I'm sure we can put that all behind us and... [the dogs start attacking Homer, causing him to scream] [from trailer] Ned Flanders: Look at that, you can see the four states that border Springfield: Ohio, Nevada, Maine, and Kentucky! Bart Simpson: Oh yeah. [from trailer] Homer Simpson: Time to save my family!
《辛普森一家》其他对白（字数有限）：1 00:00:43,048 --> 00:00:44,643 We come in peace. 2 00:00:44,644 --> 00:00:47,315 For cats and mice, Everywhere. 3 00:01:06,944 --> 00:01:08,019 Hey! How you doing? 4 00:01:08,020 --> 00:01:09,076 Good to see you. 5 00:01:09,077 --> 00:01:10,483 Thanks for coming out. 6 00:01:17,755 --> 00:01:19,215 Itchy... 7 00:01:19,249 --> 00:01:20,675 Itchy. 8 00:01:59,291 --> 00:02:00,734 Boring! 9 00:02:00,735 --> 00:02:02,881 Dad! We cant see the movie! 10 00:02:02,979 --> 00:02:06,862 I cant believe we`re paying to see somthing we get on tv for free! 11 00:02:07,057 --> 00:02:10,829 If you ask me everybody in this theater is a giant sucker! 12 00:02:10,921 --> 00:02:13,311 Espacally YOU! 13 00:02:14,292 --> 00:02:17,275 The Simpsons 14 00:02:17,309 --> 00:02:20,838 Movie, On the big screen! 15 00:02:50,469 --> 00:02:52,684 Excuse me my hinny is dipping 16 00:03:08,843 --> 00:03:10,860 Alright. Well thanks alot for coming. 17 00:03:10,861 --> 00:03:13,133 You`ve been playing for 3.5 hours. 18 00:03:13,167 --> 00:03:17,656 Now we`d like just a minute of your time to say somthing about the environment! 19 00:03:19,471 --> 00:03:22,433 Boo! - You Suck! 20 00:03:22,534 --> 00:03:24,550 Shout up and play! - Preachy! 21 00:03:24,572 --> 00:03:25,859 We`re not been Preachy. 22 00:03:25,901 --> 00:03:29,518 But the pollution in your lake. Is disassemble our barouche. 23 00:03:32,220 --> 00:03:34,341 I thought they touched on a vital issue. 24 00:03:34,386 --> 00:03:35,852 I beg to differ. 25 00:03:40,865 --> 00:03:43,548 Gentlemen, Its been an honor playing with you tonight. 26 00:04:04,891 --> 00:04:08,098 For the latest rock band to die in our town. 27 00:04:08,143 --> 00:04:10,561 Lord hear our prayer. 28 00:04:10,633 --> 00:04:12,365 Lord hear our prayer. 29 00:04:13,652 --> 00:04:16,622 I hate been late! - Well i hate going! 30 00:04:16,671 --> 00:04:18,498 Why cant i worship the lord my own way? 31 00:04:18,499 --> 00:04:20,298 Like praying like hell on my death bed. 32 00:04:20,299 --> 00:04:22,599 Homer they can hear you inside! 33 00:04:21,600 --> 00:04:26,834 Relax those payout morons are to bussy talking to thier phony baloney god. 34 00:04:30,500 --> 00:04:31,317 How you doing? 35 00:04:31,374 --> 00:04:33,505 Peace be with you. Pray is cheapest. 36 00:04:44,181 --> 00:04:46,346 Now, Today i want to try somthing a little different. 37 00:04:46,406 --> 00:04:48,996 Im gonna call on one of you! 38 00:04:50,289 --> 00:04:53,034 Now, The word of god dwells with an everyone. 39 00:04:53,068 --> 00:04:54,914 I want you to let that word out! 40 00:04:54,948 --> 00:04:56,243 Let your spirit... 41 00:04:57,937 --> 00:04:58,822 What is it, Ned? 42 00:04:58,823 --> 00:05:01,315 The god lord telling me to confest to somthing. 43 00:05:01,349 --> 00:05:03,600 Gay, Gay, Gay, Gay, Gay, Gay,Gay, Gay. 44 00:05:03,601 --> 00:05:06,785 Animades sense of pride in our community. 45 00:05:07,152 --> 00:05:08,740 Somebody else? 46 00:05:08,954 --> 00:05:12,206 Let the lord`s light shine upon you. 47 00:05:16,389 --> 00:05:18,471 Feel a spirit. 48 00:05:19,452 --> 00:05:20,910 Let it out! 49 00:05:21,366 --> 00:05:24,758 Horrible, Horrible things are going to happen! 50 00:05:25,384 --> 00:05:27,412 And they`re gonna happen to you, And you, And you, 51 00:05:27,446 --> 00:05:29,177 And you! 52 00:05:29,217 --> 00:05:30,436 Oh belly! 53 00:05:34,806 --> 00:05:37,859 People of Springfield hit this warning: 54 00:05:37,893 --> 00:05:39,087 Twisted tail, 55 00:05:39,121 --> 00:05:40,782 A thousand eyes, 56 00:05:40,816 --> 00:05:42,844 Trapped forever! 57 00:05:46,659 --> 00:05:48,180 Dad, Do somthing! 58 00:05:48,351 --> 00:05:50,588 This book dosen`t have any answers! 59 00:05:50,610 --> 00:05:53,107 Beware, Beware! Time is short! 60 00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:54,578 "EPA"! "EPA"! 61 00:05:54,602 --> 00:05:56,882 "EPA"! 62 00:05:57,302 --> 00:06:00,305 Believe me! Believe me! 63 00:06:06,485 --> 00:06:08,083 Thanks for listening. 64 00:06:13,111 --> 00:06:16,399 Ok, Who wants waffles? - I do! I do! I do! 65 00:06:16,423 --> 00:06:17,911 Wait a minute. What about grandpa? 66 00:06:17,962 --> 00:06:19,477 I want syrup! - I want strawberry! 67 00:06:19,529 --> 00:06:21,268 Something happen to that man. 68 00:06:21,305 --> 00:06:22,937 I`ll tell you what happen to him. 69 00:06:22,976 --> 00:06:26,164 A serrten someone had a senior moment. 70 00:06:26,212 --> 00:06:28,900 But thats ok because we love him. 71 00:06:28,934 --> 00:06:30,932 And we got a free rug out of it. 72 00:06:31,935 --> 00:06:34,120 What is the point of going to church every sunday, 73 00:06:34,153 --> 00:06:37,358 When of someone we love had a genuine religious experience. 74 00:06:37,392 --> 00:06:39,674 We ignore it. Right grandpa? 75 00:06:40,793 --> 00:06:44,657 I want bananas on my waffles! - I rest my case. 76 00:06:45,636 --> 00:06:47,382 Im not droping this. 77 00:06:52,281 --> 00:06:54,944 Wait a minute im still in the car! 78 00:06:54,939 --> 00:06:56,129 Oh, Right. 79 00:07:02,136 --> 00:07:03,836 Take that hornets nest. 80 00:07:09,959 --> 00:07:10,986 Check. 81 00:07:11,293 --> 00:07:12,566 Fix sink hole. 82 00:07:20,487 --> 00:07:21,623 Check. 83 00:07:21,990 --> 00:07:23,437 Rushing the roof?! 84 00:07:27,517 --> 00:07:28,602 Steady.. 85 00:07:29,857 --> 00:07:31,486 Steady... 86 00:07:36,969 --> 00:07:42,166 You little.. I`ll teach you to laugh! At something thats funny! 87 00:07:43,102 --> 00:07:45,746 You know we are on the roof we chould have some fun. 88 00:07:46,321 --> 00:07:47,955 What kind of fun? 89 00:07:48,230 --> 00:07:50,043 How about a dare contest? 90 00:07:50,090 --> 00:07:52,637 Thats sounds fun! I dare you to.. 91 00:07:52,725 --> 00:07:54,928 Climb the tv antenna! 92 00:07:56,599 --> 00:07:58,595 Piece of cake. - Earthquake! 93 00:08:05,082 --> 00:08:06,511 Aftershock! 94 00:08:09,239 --> 00:08:11,607 Ah, Homer i dont mean to be nervous perverted or anything. 95 00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:15,948 But if he falls. Chouldn`t that make your boy parallel prejorino? 96 00:08:15,954 --> 00:08:19,354 Shut up Flanders! - Yeah, Shut up Flanders! 97 00:08:19,361 --> 00:08:20,538 Well said boy! 98 00:08:21,966 --> 00:08:25,109 Steady. Steady. Steady.. 99 00:08:30,362 --> 00:08:32,674 Hello. Sorry to bother you on a sunday. 100 00:08:32,707 --> 00:08:36,624 But im sure you as worried about the pollution in lake Springfield as i am. 101 00:08:42,841 --> 00:08:46,127 Lake Springfield has higher levels of mercury, Than even.. 102 00:08:53,237 --> 00:08:56,790 My. Its the little girl who saved my cat. 103 00:08:56,860 --> 00:08:58,093 Lake Springfield.. 104 00:09:08,754 --> 00:09:10,662 Come on over Lisa. 105 00:09:10,716 --> 00:09:13,512 You can convince me as long as you want. 106 00:09:13,513 --> 00:09:15,943 Milhouse, You dont care about the environment. 107 00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:18,853 Hey! I am very passionate about the planet! 108 00:09:18,854 --> 00:09:20,436 Say global warming is a myth! 109 00:09:20,470 --> 00:09:22,929 Its a myth! For the study is needed! 110 00:09:23,853 --> 00:09:26,228 Thats for selling out your beliefs! 111 00:09:27,786 --> 00:09:29,970 Oh, Poor Milhouse. 112 00:09:30,816 --> 00:09:32,671 Dream coming true. 113 00:09:32,826 --> 00:09:35,493 Are you aware that a licking faucet can waste over.. 114 00:09:35,586 --> 00:09:36,771 2000 Gallons a year. 115 00:09:36,873 --> 00:09:39,582 Entire enough we are can save.. - Enough energy to power Pittsburgh. 116 00:09:39,586 --> 00:09:42,246 And if we just kept our thermostats at 68 at the winter.. 117 00:09:42,247 --> 00:09:45,283 We`ll be free in our dependency on foreign oil in 17 years. 118 00:09:45,375 --> 00:09:46,568 Im Colin. 119 00:09:47,114 --> 00:09:48,652 I haven`t seen you in school. 120 00:09:48,653 --> 00:09:50,686 I just bo from Ireland. My dad is a musician. 121 00:09:50,844 --> 00:09:52,339 Is he..? - He`s not "Bono". 122 00:09:52,363 --> 00:09:54,603 I just thought because you`re Irish and you care about the.. 123 00:09:54,610 --> 00:09:56,091 He`s not "Bono"! 124 00:09:56,627 --> 00:09:57,328 Do you play? 125 00:09:57,373 --> 00:09:59,808 Just Piano, Guitar, Trumpet, Drum and Bass. 126 00:09:59,874 --> 00:10:01,359 He`s pure gold. 127 00:10:01,402 --> 00:10:03,956 For once in your life be cool! 128 00:10:03,987 --> 00:10:06,285 So, Is your name is pretty as your face? 129 00:10:10,950 --> 00:10:12,475 You ok there? 130 00:10:15,218 --> 00:10:18,743 Twisted tail, A thousand eyes, Trapped forever! 131 00:10:18,809 --> 00:10:23,013 "EPA"! "EPA"! - "EPA"? What chould that be? 132 00:10:23,020 --> 00:10:24,678 I believe its the sound that "Green Lantern" made, 133 00:10:24,679 --> 00:10:27,748 When "Sinestro" throw him into a bath of acid. 134 00:10:27,766 --> 00:10:30,028 EEEPPPAAA! 135 00:10:30,158 --> 00:10:33,485 Yeah... Thanks for coming over. 136 00:10:33,712 --> 00:10:35,734 Thanks for giving me your pregnancy pants. 137 00:10:35,731 --> 00:10:37,711 I never known comfort like this. 138 00:10:41,424 --> 00:10:42,068 I did i.. 139 00:10:43,069 --> 00:10:44,369 Suggest this. 140 00:10:54,346 --> 00:10:57,013 Alright boy. Time for the ultimate dare. 141 00:10:57,300 --> 00:11:02,088 I dare you, To skateboard to "Krusty Burger" and back.. 142 00:11:03,152 --> 00:11:05,365 Naked... 143 00:11:05,368 --> 00:11:07,082 How naked? - "Forth Base". 144 00:11:07,083 --> 00:11:08,520 The girls might see my doodle. 145 00:11:08,613 --> 00:11:13,665 Oh, I see.. Then i here by declare you chicken for life. 146 00:11:13,667 --> 00:11:17,606 Every morning you`ll wake up to: "Good Morning Chicken"! 147 00:11:17,703 --> 00:11:20,458 At your wedding i`ll sing: Bak bak bak bak. 148 00:11:20,459 --> 00:11:21,759 Bak bak bak.. 149 00:11:21,860 --> 00:11:22,760 Bak?! 150 00:11:33,057 --> 00:11:34,997 I like men now. 151 00:11:35,567 --> 00:11:36,838 Dont look where im pointing! 152 00:11:55,457 --> 00:11:58,068 Stop in the name of american sqwimmering! 153 00:12:06,687 --> 00:12:11,019 Boys before we eat dont forget to thank the lord for this bonderful.. 154 00:12:11,262 --> 00:12:12,240 Penis! 155 00:12:12,141 --> 00:12:14,451 Bonderful penis. 156 00:12:14,481 --> 00:12:15,617 Amen. 157 00:12:16,689 --> 00:12:18,774 Listen kid. Nobody like to wearing clothes in public. 158 00:12:18,775 --> 00:12:20,902 But you know, Its, Its the law. 159 00:12:24,538 --> 00:12:25,848 Lunch time! 160 00:12:26,482 --> 00:12:28,189 You cant just leave me out here! 161 00:12:28,190 --> 00:12:30,938 Dont worry. We found a friend for you to play with. 162 00:12:39,851 --> 00:12:42,127 Nelson, Honey. Where have you been? 163 00:12:47,156 --> 00:12:49,602 Dad! - Whats seems to be the problem officers? 164 00:12:49,780 --> 00:12:51,634 Tell them you dared me to do it! 165 00:12:51,651 --> 00:12:55,812 If thats true. Then you should be taking the rap here not you son. 166 00:12:57,821 --> 00:13:01,222 And.. What happens to me if its my fault? 167 00:13:01,223 --> 00:13:03,967 You`ll have to attempt an one hour parenting class. 168 00:13:03,972 --> 00:13:06,530 It was all his idea! He`s out of control, I tell you! 169 00:13:06,564 --> 00:13:08,825 I met my wet sand. 170 00:13:11,669 --> 00:13:13,387 See you in court kid. 171 00:13:13,893 --> 00:13:15,517 Ok son. Lets get some lunch. 172 00:13:15,602 --> 00:13:19,505 Did you al least bring my cloths? - Shirt, Socks, Everything you need. 173 00:13:19,606 --> 00:13:20,999 You didn`t bring my pants! 174 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:22,655 Who am i? "Tommy Bahama"? 175 00:13:23,215 --> 00:13:25,316 This is the worst day of my life. 176 00:13:25,362 --> 00:13:27,821 This is the worst day of your life so far.. 177 00:13:31,933 --> 00:13:34,259 Say Bart.. - What do you want Flanders? 178 00:13:34,260 --> 00:13:36,556 If you need pants, I carry an extra pair. 179 00:13:36,557 --> 00:13:37,155 I mean.. 180 00:13:37,156 --> 00:13:40,224 You know how boys are always, "Praying through the knees". 181 00:13:40,325 --> 00:13:42,478 Why are you helping me? Im not your kid. 182 00:13:42,544 --> 00:13:43,503 We`re neighbors. 183 00:13:43,504 --> 00:13:46,373 Im sure your father will do the same for my boys. 184 00:13:46,457 --> 00:13:47,864 Thank you! 185 00:13:55,015 --> 00:13:57,600 Hey, Whats with you? - You realy wanna know? 186 00:13:57,697 --> 00:14:01,716 Of course i do. What kind of a father wouldn`t care about a.. 187 00:14:01,717 --> 00:14:03,054 A pig wearing a hat! 188 00:14:04,256 --> 00:14:04,824 Action! 189 00:14:05,612 --> 00:14:07,719 Hey! Hey! Its your old pal Krusty! 190 00:14:07,753 --> 00:14:10,177 For my new pork sandwich: "The Klager". 191 00:14:10,178 --> 00:14:14,422 If you can find a greasyer sandwich.. You`re in Mexico! 192 00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:20,805 And we`re clear. 193 00:14:21,278 --> 00:14:23,286 Perfect. Cut, Print, Kill the pig. 194 00:14:25,242 --> 00:14:28,584 What? You cant kill him if he`s wearing people cloth. 195 00:14:41,255 --> 00:14:43,746 You`re coming home with me. 196 00:14:47,363 --> 00:14:49,036 A thousand eyes. 197 00:14:49,040 --> 00:14:50,493 What chould that be? 198 00:14:51,121 --> 00:14:53,623 Im pretty sure a thousand.. 199 00:14:53,624 --> 00:14:54,906 Is a number. 200 00:14:54,910 --> 00:14:55,653 Hey Marge! 「知无不言.言无不尽.百人誉之不加密.百人毁之不加疏.」-- 诸葛廷栋
你去看看中文的字幕吧！/programs/view/g_lONPPVimM/
您可能关注的推广回答者：From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Grand Design is a
written by
and published by
in 2010. It argues that invoking God is not necessary to explain the origins of the universe, and that the
is a consequence of the laws of
alone. In response to criticism, H "One can't prove that God doesn't exist, but science makes God unnecessary." When pressed on his own religious views by the
documentary , he has clarified that he does not believe in a personal God.
The authors of the book point out that a
(a theory, based on an early model of the , proposed by
and other physicists) may not exist. The book examines the history of scientific knowledge about the universe and explains 11 dimension , a theory many modern physicists support.
Published in the United States on September 7, 2010, the book became the number one
just a few days after publication. It was published in the United Kingdom on September 9, 2010, and became the number two bestseller on
on the same day. It topped the list of adult
books of the
in Sept-Oct 2010.
The book examines the history of scientific knowledge about the universe. It starts with the
, who claimed that nature works by laws, and not by the will of the gods. It later presents the work of , who advocated the concept that the Earth is not located in the center of the universe.
The authors then describe the theory of
using, as an example, the probable movement of an
around a room. The presentation has been described as easy to understand by some reviewers, but also as sometimes "impenetrable," by others.
The central claim of the book is that the theory of
together help us understand how universes could have formed out of nothing.
The authors write:
Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going.
—Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, The Grand Design, 2010
The authors explain, in a manner consistent with , that as the Earth is only one of several
in our , and as our
is only one of many galaxies, the same may apply to our universe itself: that is, our universe may be one of a huge number of universes.
The book concludes with the statement that only some universes of the multiple universes (or ) support life forms. We, of course, are located in one of those universes. The laws of nature that are required for life forms to exist appear in some universes by pure chance, Hawking and Mlodinow explain (see ).
and advocate for
welcomed Hawking's position and said that " kicked God out of biology but physics remained more uncertain. Hawking is now administering the ."
Theoretical physicist , writing in , described the book as speculative but ambitious: "The important lesson of The Grand Design is not so much the particular theory being advocated but the sense that science may be able to answer the deep 'Why?' questions that are part of fundamental human curiosity."
Dr. , in his article "Our Spontaneous Universe", wrote that "there are remarkable, testable arguments that provide firmer
of the possibility that our universe arose from nothing. ... If our universe arose spontaneously from nothing at all, one might predict that its total energy should be zero. And when we measure the total energy of the universe, which could have been anything, the answer turns out to be the only one consistent with this possibility. Coincidence? Maybe. But data like this coming in from our revolutionary new tools promise to turn much of what is now
into physics. Whether God survives is anyone's guess."
, a professor of physics at , said in his
review: "I've waited a long time for this book. It gets into the deepest questions of modern
without a single equation. The reader will be able to get through it without bogging down in a lot of technical detail and will, I hope, have his or her appetite whetted for books with a deeper technical content. And who knows? Maybe in the end the whole
idea will actually turn out to be right!" Canada Press journalist Carl Hartman said: "Cosmologists, the people who study the entire cosmos, will want to read British physicist and mathematician Stephen Hawking's new book. The Grand Design may sharpen appetites for answers to questions like 'Why is there something rather than nothing?' and 'Why do we exist?' – questions that have troubled thinking people at least as far back as the ancient Greeks."
Writing in the ,
praised the authors: "their arguments do indeed bring us closer to seeing our world, universe and multiverse in terms that a previous generation might easily have dismissed as supernatural. This succinct, easily digested book could perhaps do with fewer dry, academic groaners, but Hawking and Mlodinow pack in a wealth of ideas and leave us with a clearer understanding of modern physics in all its invigorating complexity."
German daily
devoted the whole opening page of its culture section to The Grand Design.
physicist and novelist
reviews the history of the
from the 18th century to , and takes Hawking's conclusion on God's existence as a very good joke which he obviously welcomes very much.
doubts that adequate understandings can come from this approach, and points out that "unlike quantum mechanics,
enjoys no observational support whatsoever".
in Science suggests that "Some humbleness would be welcome here...A century or two hence...I expect that M-theory will seem as na?ve to cosmologists of the future as we now find 's cosmology of the ".
in "The Big Bang Creation: God or the Laws of Nature" explains that "The Grand Design breaks the news, bitter to some, that … to create a universe from absolute nothing God is not necessary. All that is needed are the laws of nature. … [That is,] there can have been a big bang creation without the help of God, provided the laws of nature pre-date the universe. Our concept of time begins with the creation of the universe. Therefore if the laws of nature created the universe, these laws must have e that is the laws of nature would be outside of time. What we have then is totally non-physical laws, outside of time, creating a universe. Now that description might sound somewhat familiar. Very much like the biblical concept of God: not physical, outside of time, able to create a universe."
was critical of the book, saying: "The real news about The Grand Design is how disappointingly tinny and inelegant it is. The spare and earnest voice that Mr. Hawking employed with such appeal in
has been replaced here by one that is alternately condescending, as if he were
explaining rain clouds to toddlers, and impenetrable."
, in the , was not convinced by the theory promoted in the book: "M-theory ... is far from complete. But that doesn't stop the authors from asserting that it explains the mysteries of existence ... In the absence of theory, though, this is nothing more than a hunch doomed – until we start watching universes come into being – to remain untested. The lesson isn't that we face a dilemma between God and the , but that we shouldn't go off the rails at the first sign of coincidences.
wrote: "The multiverse comes with a lot of baggage, such as an overarching space and time to host all those bangs, a universe-generating mechanism to trigger them, physical fields to populate the universes with material stuff, and a selection of forces to make things happen. Cosmologists embrace these features by envisaging sweeping "meta-laws" that pervade the multiverse and spawn specific bylaws on a universe-by-universe basis. The meta-laws themselves remain unexplained – eternal, immutable transcendent entities that just happen to exist and must simply be accepted as given. In that respect the meta-laws have a similar status to an unexplained transcendent god." Davies concludes "there is no compelling need for a supernatural being or prime mover to start the universe off. But when it comes to the laws that explain the big bang, we are in murkier waters."
Dr. , in his article "Hawking And God: An Intimate Relationship", stated that "contemplating a final theory is inconsistent with the very essence of physics, an empirical science based on the gradual collection of data. Because we don’t have instruments capable of measuring all of Nature, we cannot ever be certain that we have a final theory. There’ll always be room for surprises, as the history of physics has shown again and again. In fact, I find it quite pretentious to imagine that we humans can achieve such a thing. ... Maybe Hawking should leave God alone."
Physicist , of , has criticized the book: "One thing that is sure to generate sales for a book of this kind is to somehow drag in religion. The book's rather conventional claim that "God is unnecessary" for explaining physics and early universe cosmology has provided a lot of publicity for the book. I'm in favor of naturalism and leaving God out of physics as much as the next person, but if you're the sort who wants to go to battle in the , why you would choose to take up such a dubious weapon as M-theory mystifies me."
is not sympathetic to the book: "M-theory, theorists now realize, comes in an almost infinite number of versions, which "predict" an almost infinite number of possible universes. Critics call this the " problem," a reference to the refrain of the old
folk song: "You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant." Of course, a theory that predicts everything really doesn't predict anything... The
has always struck me as so dumb that I can't understand why anyone takes it seriously. It's cosmology's version of . ... The physicist , with whom I worked at Scientific American in the 1990s, liked to say that the anthropic principle in any form is completely ridiculous and hence should be called CRAP. ... Hawking is telling us that unconfirmable M-theory plus the anthropic tautology represents the end of that quest. If we believe him, the joke’s on us."
is also critical of the book: Hawking and Mlodinow "...say that these surprising ideas have passed every experimental test to which they have been put, but that is misleading in a way that is unfortunately typical of the authors. It is the bare bones of quantum mechanics that have proved to be consistent with what is presently known of the subatomic world. The authors' interpretations and extrapolations of it have not been subjected to any decisive tests, and it is not clear that they ever could be. Once upon a time it was the province of philosophy to propose ambitious and outlandish theories in advance of any concrete evidence for them. Perhaps science, as Professor Hawking and Mr Mlodinow practice it in their airier moments, has indeed changed places with philosophy, though probably not quite in the way that they think."
The , Dr. , said, "Science can never prove the non-existence of God, just as it can never prove the existence of God."
Dr. Fraser N. Watts said "a creator God provides a reasonable and credible explanation of why there is a universe, and ... it is somewhat more likely that there is a God than that there is not. That view is not undermined by what Hawking has said."
British scientist
also criticized the book in an interview with : "Of course they can make whatever comments they like, but when they assume, rather in a -like way, that they have all the answers, then I do feel uncomfortable." She later claimed her Taliban remarks were "not intended to be personal", saying she "admired Stephen Hawking greatly" and "had no wish to compare him in particular to the Taliban".
Richard Allen Greene (). . CNN.
Nick Watt (2010). .
, Age of the Sage, Retrieved
, Telegraph, Retrieved
, Telegraph,
Michael Moorcock (). . .
Dwight Garner (). . New York Times.
Nate Freeman (). . .
James Trefil (). . Washington Post.
Michael Holden (). . Reuters.
. The Economist. .
(). . Wall Street Journal.
Hartman, Carl (). . .
Ralf B?nt (September 2010). . .
FT 4-Sept-2010
Science 8 October 2010: Vol. 330 no. 6001 pp. 179-180 :
Craig Callender (). .
Paul Davies (). . The Guardian (London).
(). . Scientific American.
. The Economist. .
, Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge
. Retrieved September 2010.
: Hidden categories:}