行为金融学的综述--Behavioral Corporate Finance： A Survey -- Baker Ruback Wurgler_百度文库
两大类热门资源免费畅读
续费一年阅读会员，立省24元！
评价文档：
喜欢此文档的还喜欢
行为金融学的综述--Behavioral Corporate Finance： A Survey -- Baker Ruback Wurgler
B​e​h​a​v​i​o​r​a​l​ ​C​o​r​p​o​r​a​t​e​ ​F​i​n​a​n​c​e​：​ ​A​ ​S​u​r​v​e​y​ ​-​-​ ​B​a​k​e​r​ ​R​u​b​a​c​k​ ​W​u​r​g​l​e​r
阅读已结束，如果下载本文需要使用
想免费下载本文？
把文档贴到Blog、BBS或个人站等：
普通尺寸(450*500pix)
较大尺寸(630*500pix)
你可能喜欢Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?
from /Anotherrobot.htm
of Ancient Electrical Devices found in the Great
Christopher Dunn
June 2, 2011
New images from inside the
Great Pyramid shaft reveal evidence of electrical terminals, cables
and even ancient wiring diagrams!
The discovery of electrical
contacts and wiring inside the Great Pyramid, along with markings
that show how to connect them, do not fit anywhere in conventional
Egyptology but confirm the theory first published in my book, The
Giza Power Plant: Technologies of Ancient Egypt in 1998.
Only this theory has ever made
such predictions, and every robot explorer they send up the shafts
finds more and more evidence to prove that the theory is
Background and details
The Great Pyramid has long been
a source of mystery for the world. Specialists and lay people alike
have been drawn to what it might tell us about our ancient past,
with a variety of theories being offered for consideration. While
there are over a hundred pyramids in Egypt, the majority of them,
while important and significant themselves, seem all to be cast in
the shadow of the Great. What is it about this pyramid that makes
it so GREAT?
Going back as far as the 17
century, there are accounts of numerous explorations into the Great
Pyramid that have yielded significant new details of the structure.
In more recent times, a flurry of excitement has surrounded the
mystery of a small shaft discovered in 1872 in the wall of the
Queen’s Chamber. This shaft did not connect to the chamber and was
discovered after a rod was pushed into a small crack in the wall
and, after meeting no resistance, prompted Waynman Dixon, a British explorer, to have the
limestone chiseled away revealing a rectangular opening that
measured 20.32 cm (8.00 in) wide and 22.35 cm (8.8 in) high. A
similar shaft was subsequently found in the north wall.
In 1993, a German robotics
engineer, , on contract to install ventilation
fans in the King’s Chamber shafts after cleaning the debris using a
robot, proposed that he use his robot, named “Upuaut II”, meaning “opener of the ways”, to
explore the Southern Shaft in the Queen’s Chamber to coax from the
depths of pyramid more of its secrets. While the exits from the
shafts from the King’s Chamber are found on the outside of the
pyramid, no exit has ever been found for either of the Queen’s
Chamber shafts.
Because of the machine like
technical appearance of the Great Pyramid and the precision with
which it was built, in 1977, I began developing a theory that the
original function of the Great Pyramid was not a tomb but a power
plant. Within the context of the power plant, all its attributes
and anomalous features that other theories were unable to explain
without resorting to religious symbolism, found a practical answer.
The Queen’s Chamber, I proposed, served as a reaction chamber and
the shafts leading to this chamber supplied two chemicals that when
mixed together created hydrogen. In 1993 I was viewing the
exploration by Gantenbrink and when
Upuaut II came to the end of the shaft,
what is now famously known as Gantenbrink’s “door” came into view with two metal
pins attached.
Jeff Summer, a friend with whom
I was watching the video, immediately claimed that they looked like
electrodes. This made sense to me for in order to maintain the head
pressure in the shafts, they had to be kept full and the electrodes
would serve as a switch to signal replenishment. In 1998, my book,
The Giza Power Plant, was published incorporating this
Then in 2002, to much fanfare
and excitement, “Opening of the Lost Tomb”, which offered to show
live the exploration of the Queen’s Chamber southern shaft drilled
through the limestone block with the metal fittings and then insert
a camera through the hole to see what was behind it. Broadcast in
Europe by National Geographic and in the US by Fox Television the
documentary capture 30 million viewers in the US alone.
Since the publication of my
book and prior to the broadcast I posted three articles on my
website explaining my reasoning behind my analysis of these shafts
and what would be revealed if we were able to look behind it. Based
on what I wrote in The Giza Power Plant, the last article outlined
a prediction of what would be found behind the block. &The
included a
drawing of the continuation of the metal fittings, or wiring
attached to them, and a chemical supply shaft for the delivery of
the chemical.
The results were not
conclusive, but parts of the theory were supported & particularly
the thickness of the block. However, what has recently been
revealed shows that my design was not quite correct. The ancient
Egyptians’ design was much better and provided greater evidence to
support my theory than I had hoped for!
In an article
published on May 25, 2011 in , the latest exploration of the
Southern Shaft in the Great Pyramid’s Queen’s Chamber provides new
information that answers the question of what the back of this
block looks like. A new robot has been sent up this shaft and had
taken more images behind a stone block. (The shaft due to its small
size could only allow a small animal to pass and Gantenbrink does not call the block a “door” as it
has been name by Egyptologists, but a USO, or Unidentified Stone
Object & a nomenclature that I will adopt for purposes of this
article.)&
I was astonished that
information regarding this long awaited exploration had been
released without fanfare. , the
minister of antiquities in Egypt, and director of this recent
expedition, described these internal features as the “last great
mystery of the Great Pyramid.” With the last exploration broadcast
on Fox television in the US garnering 30 million viewers, why was
National Geographic or Fox television not involved? &
Reading the article and looking
at the grainy images of the back of the stone block with the metal
fittings first detected by Gantenbrink’s robot, it became clear that the
author and expedition team members were aware of the power plant
theory. Rowan Hooper writes, “Metal is not part of any other known
structure in the pyramid, and the discovery ignited speculation
that the pins were door handles, keys or even parts of a power
supply constructed by aliens.” Unfortunately, comments like these
are not helpful. As the first person to publish a work that
described the pins as electrical devices, I must set the record
straight that I have never credited the construction of the Great
Pyramid to aliens, or any other people except the indigenous people
living in that area at the time. Moreover, the discovery of the
pins in 1993 was not the trigger that gave birth to the idea that
the Great Pyram they simply enhanced the
proposed use that I had formulated in 1977 for the Queen’s Chamber
and the shafts.
Shaun Whitehead the camera
designer from the company
in Melton Mowbray, UK said "Our new pictures from behind the
pins show that they end in small, beautifully made loops,
indicating that they were more likely ornamental rather than
electrical connections."
Egyptologist Kate Spence, of
the University of Cambridge, UK,
indicated that the USO would have served a symbolic purpose, a door
with door handles. This notion has been proposed before. Without
knowing what the rest of the metal looked like these features were
described as symbolic door handles for the King to use to
symbolically raise the door so that his soul can fly off to the
stars to which the pyramid shafts are allegedly aligned.
The continuation of the pins on
the backside of Gantenbrink’s USO was
not the only discovery captured by the new robot. The images also
revealed a line and some symbols painted on the floor in red. Peter
Der Manuelian, an Egyptologist at Harvard University
and director of the Giza Archives at the Museum of Fine Arts,
Boston, said "Red-painted numbers and graffiti are very common
around Giza. They are often masons' or work-gangs' marks, denoting
numbers, dates or even the names of the gangs."
There was no immediate
explanation for what these red symbols mean, but they are a
significant discovery and have the potential to open up an entirely
new area of research in gaining an understanding of ancient
Egyptian symbolism. When considered along with the metal pins the
symbols provide all the evidence necessary to prove the electrical
use of the pins and also give us a roadmap for exploration into the
future. Not only did the ancient Egyptians leave us with the
physical evidence that proves this to be so, they also provided us
with an electrical schematic that showed how the pins were
The first most important
discovery is the design of the two pins. Judging by their
relationship to the size of the space, the pins are approximately
.8 cm 5/16 inch in diameter. Figure 1 shows the metal looping
around, with an apparent gap where the loop on the right pin
seemingly disappears into the limestone block. The left pin shows
signs of corrosion, similar to those in the main shaft, though not
as severe. There also seems to be a white deposit around the left
pin and its hole, while the right pin has what appears to be a
black ring encircling the hole that penetrates through to the main
<img ALT="GantenbrinkUSO" src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/Figure%201.jpg" WIDTH="750" HEIGHT="274"
TITLE="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
The Backside of Gantenbrink’s
USO showing the looped metal pins.
As these images did not match
those that I had predicted, the expedition team evidently believed
that the controversy had been settled and that that they served as
more mundane object and not electrical devices. This conclusion
certainly would be more acceptable to those who hold the keys to
the pyramid and control what information is given to the public.
What was not noted in the report is what appears to be corrosion on
one of the pins.
Nor was evidence of flexible
conduit curling out of the top of the USO near the center and
traveling along the ceiling mentioned. (See Figure 2)
<img ALT="Enhance image" src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/Figure%202.jpg" WIDTH="750" HEIGHT="260"
TITLE="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
Enhanced photograph of the features behind Gantenbrink’s USO.
The image of the floor behind
the USO is especially intriguing (see Figure 3 &
Figure 4). The patchwork of video captured and stitched together
images reveals a wealth of information. The helical wraps of more
flexible conduit can be seen lying on the floor near the bottom of
the image just left of the red painted line - probably left there
by the maintenance crew. The metallic appearance of this object and
the helical turns of the metal has the
same appearance as a length of flexible conduit that has been
pulled apart while being disassembled would have. There are
indication of more lengths of this
material on the floor that are not as distinct as this one. Also
just above and to the right of the red line is what appears to be
an opening in the floor with anomalous objects nearby and one of
them seeming to disappear into the opening. &If it is proven that
this is indeed a rectangular hole in the floor, is this the
chemical supply shaft, will it be found elsewhere?
<img src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/B334_23/images/products/250x250/Flexible-Aluminum-Conduit-3FLE9_AS01.JPG" TITLE="Flexible Conduit, 1/2In, 25Ft, Aluminum" WIDTH="530" HEIGHT="148" NAME="3FLF2_itemDetails"
ALT="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
example of flexible conduit used for industrial wiring
applications
<img ALT="Floorbehinduso" src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/Figure%204.jpg" WIDTH="750" HEIGHT="465"
TITLE="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
Figure 4 The floor in the space behind Gantenbrink’s USO
While it appears that the
maintenance crew did not clean up after performing repairs in the
space behind the USO, the debris was not the only evidence they
left there. They also left instructions on how to wire the pins!
These instructions were painted as symbols onto the floor and
represent a simple wiring diagram. The uppermost symbol & depicted
as a number 5 with the lower loop almost closed, represents the
left connector through which the pin is pushed until the end of the
loop meets the limestone. The pin was probably tapered at the end
which allowed it to enter the loop and gradually push it open while
the connector loop held onto the pin as it tried to achieve its
original shape. The vertical leg of this connector is not to scale
(as very few wiring diagrams are) but the actual connector probably
had a longer vertical leg up to the point when it is bent at right
angles towards the center of the block.
The center symbol that shows a
round circle with a forked line below it could represent the cable
through which electricity flowed. It is positioned between the
upper and lower connector symbols on the floor as the flexible
conduit is positioned between the right and left pins in the
The lower connector symbol is
roughly similar to the upper with the exception of the top bend,
which could go right or left as when installed it wouldn’t matter
which way the loop was turned.
All the symbols, including the
line (which would logically represent the main cable coming from
the USO) were more than likely positioned on the side that would
identify the positive electrode. This is supported by the
appearance of a greater amount of corrosion on the loop on the side
where the symbols appear.
All of that which is revealed
by the Djedi robot describes an
electrical device which was accessible to workers for maintenance.
Considering the erosion on the pins in the main shaft (the negative
electrode having broken off in antiquity) and considering the
extreme tapering that was more than likely caused by the rise and
fall of a corrosive liquid, another significant conclusion that can
be made is that these electrodes must have been replaced
periodically. At the same time, the electrical cables were probably
replaced and some of the shielding was left in the space. The
entire design supports this view! The pins were made so that they
could be removed easily and another one put in its place. Also,
seating the lower loop into a blind hole would prevent the
electrode from turning in the hole. After it was seated in
position, the pin protruding into the main shaft would be bent 90
degrees and fixed securely in operating position.
Gantenbrink’s
Upuaut II also revealed another important feature
about the electrodes. After they were positioned in the hole, a
sealant was applied and this can be seen clearly in Figure
<img ALT="PinSealant" src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/leftfit.JPG" WIDTH="400" HEIGHT="329"
TITLE="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
Figure 5. Gantenbrink's USO showing the metal
pin with sealant around it.
The implications of this
analysis are stunning. They clearly indicate that there is access
to the end of the Queen’s Chamber shafts and a passageway or
passageways exist(s) within the pyramid. This lends support for
theory and
suggests that it indeed exists for access not just to the Queen’s
Chamber shafts, but also other parts of the structure & whether
they are working parts or not.
Besides prompting further
exploration in the Great Pyramid, to find ancient symbols and to be
able to clearly connect them with a previously unknown aspect of
human activity in millennia past is extremely exciting. It opens up
a whole new area of study using knowledge and tools that have been
previously excluded from ancient Egyptian studies.
<img ALT="Assembly" src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/Assembly%20of%20door3.jpg" WIDTH="750" HEIGHT="509"
TITLE="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
The internal cavities of the USO with
connectors and wiring.
<img ALT="Assembly side view" src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/Assembly%20of%20door1.jpg" WIDTH="750" HEIGHT="439"
TITLE="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
Figure 7. The
electrode being pushed through the copper connector located inside
<img ALT="Fluidswitch" src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/Exploration%.jpg" WIDTH="750" HEIGHT="683"
TITLE="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
Maintaining the fluid levels in the pyramid
The author would like to thank the following
people for their input and advice while preparing this article:
Dr. Arlan Andrews.
Stephen Mehler
Judd Peck Esq.
Dr. John DeSalvo
The research will continue with the building of
a model based on the ancient Egyptian's design.
Gantenbrink's "door" Revisited in 2010! 2011?
Latest News on 2010
2011 Exploration of Great Pyramid Shafts:
11/29/2010 No word on the much hyped exploration
of the shafts. Perhaps 2011 will bring some news.
8/18/2010&&
<img ALT="Pyramiddoor" LONGDESC="Pyramiddoor" src="/blog7style/images/common/sg_trans.gif" real_src ="/Gantenbrinks%20door.jpg" WIDTH="180" HEIGHT="184"
TITLE="Evidence&of&Ancient&Electrical&Devices&found&in&the&Great&Pyramid?" />
So-called but incorrectly named "door" in the
Great Pyramid
Chris Dunn 8/17/2010
For readers who are new to
the discussion about Gantenbrink's so-called "door" at the end of
the southern shaft in the so-called "Queen's Chamber" in the
so-called "tomb" of Khufu that is correctly named The Great Pyramid
- and for those jaded observers like me who have been waiting for
years for continued research beyond this so-called "door" after it
was drilled through in 2002 - we can look forward to an event that
may overshadow Chasing Mummies in its level of interest as we are
told that further explorations using an updated robot. This robot,
the product of
in England has presumably been trial tested and approved
by Dr. Zahi Hawass, the exuberant Chairman of Egypt's Supreme
Counsel of Antiquities.
Evidently, work has already been done by the
University and a major breakthrough has been made. Hawass is
staying quiet about what the breakthrough is and no further
information or photographs/video has been released.
The lead scientist on the
project, Dr Robert Richardson of the Leeds University School of
Mechanical Engineering, gives the impression that he is not phased
by the politics of Egyptology and told the
newspaper in the UK:
"We have been working on the project for five
years," he said. "We have no preconceptions. We are trying to gain
evidence for other people to draw conclusions. There are two
shafts. The north shaft is blocked by a limestone door and nothing
has penetrated that door. With the south shaft a previous team has
measured the thickness of the stone, drilled through it and put a
camera through it and found there was another surface. We are going
to determine how thick that is and we could drill through it. We
are preparing the robot now and expect to send it up before the end
of the year. It's a big question, and it's very important not to
cause unnecessary damage. We will carry on until we find the
answer. We hope to get all the data possible which will be
sufficient to answer the questions."
Just in case new information is forthcoming, and
to weigh in on the discussion. Those who may have followed the
discussion back in 2000 - 2002, may remember a prediction I made
about what will be found behind Gantenbrink's "door." My prediction
has not changed and the articles I wrote back then are relevant
still. The time is coming again for the theory described in
to be validated or proven
false. Theories about the purpose of features within the Great
Pyramid must be agree with the overall theory regarding its
original purpose. By reading the links provided below, you will see
that in 2002, The Giza Power Plant was the only theory left
已投稿到：
以上网友发言只代表其个人观点，不代表新浪网的观点或立场。}