refuand是什么意思_百度知道
refuand是什么意思
refuand意思
re- 前缀表示返/退没 fuand 词根估计 fund（基金/资金）写错派词 refund 意思投资退即退或偿另 react（反应）recluse（隐退）、reticent（节制）
来自团队：
其他类似问题
为您推荐：
其他1条回答
refund, 退款
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁to prove to be false or erroneous, as an opinion or charge.
to prove (a person) to be in error.
1505-15; < Latin refūtāre to check, suppress, refute, rebut, equivalent to re-
+ -fūtāre presumably, “to beat” (attested only with the prefixes con- and re-; cf. )
[ri-fyoo-tuh-buh l, ref-yuh-tuh-]
/r?'fyu t? b?l, 'r?f y? t?-/
(Show IPA), adjective
refutability, noun
refutably, adverb
refuter, noun
self-refuted, adjective
self-refuting, adjective
unrefutable, adjective
unrefutably, adverb
unrefuted, adjective
unrefuting, adjective
, , , , refute (see synonym study at )
, , , refute.
(see word story at )
1. disprove, rebut. 1, 2. confute.
UnabridgedBased on the Random House Dictionary, (C) Random House, Inc. 2015.
Examples from the Web for
Historical Examples
If my belief ever had its origin in reason, it must be ever refutable by reason.
Edward Moore
It is a race-slander, refutable by any honest investigator, that the American Negro as a race is unwilling to work.
Albert Bushnell Hart
It is certainly not the least charm of a theory, says Nietzsche, that it is refutable.
Will Durant
British Dictionary definitions for
(transitive) to prove (a statement, theory, charge, etc) of (a person) to b disprove
to deny (a claim, charge, allegation, etc)
refutable ('r?fj?t?b?l; r?'fju:-) adjectiverefutability (?r?fj?t?'b?l?t?; r??fju:-) nounrefutably, adverbrefuter, noun
The use of refute to mean deny is thought by many people to be incorrect
C16: from Latin refūtāre to rebut
Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition (C) William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd.
(C) HarperCollinsPublishers , , ,
Word Origin and History for
1510s, "refuse, reject," from Middle French réfuter (16c.) and directly from Latin refutare " rebut, repress, repel, resist, oppose," from re- "back" (see ) + -futare "to beat," probably from PIE root *bhau- "to strike down" (see
Meaning "prove wrong" dates from 1540s. Since c.1964 linguists have frowned on the subtle shift in meaning towards "to deny," as it is used in connection with allegation. Related: Refuted; refuting.
Online Etymology Dictionary, (C) 2010 Douglas Harper
in Technology Expand
In lazy functional languages, a refutable pattern is one which may fail to match. An expression being matched against a refutable pattern is first evaluated to head normal form (which may fail to terminate) and then the top-level constructor of the result is compared with that of the pattern. If they are the same then any arguments are matched against the pattern's arguments otherwise the match fails. An irrefutable pattern is one which always matches. An attempt to evaluate any variable in the pattern forces the pattern to be matched as though it were refutable which may fail to match (resulting in an error) or fail to terminate. Patterns in Haskell are normally refutable but may be made irrefutable by prefixing them with a tilde (~). For example, (\ (x,y) -> 1) undefined ==> undefined (\ ~(x,y) -> 1) undefined ==> 1 Patterns in Miranda are refutable, except for tuples which are irrefutable. Thus g [x] = 2 g undefined ==> undefined f (x,y) = 1 f undefined ==> 1 Pattern bindings in local definitions are irrefutable in both languages: h = 1 where [x] = undefined ==> 1 Irrefutable patterns can be used to simulate unlifted products because they effectively ignore the top-level constructor of the expression being matched and consider only its components.
The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, (C) Denis Howe 2010
Discover our greatest slideshows
Browse more topics on our blog
Learn the correct uses of these two commonly confused homophones.
What mistaken pronunciation gave this character its name?
This small mark has two primary uses: to signify possession or omitted letters.
People invent new words all the time, but which ones actually make it?
Word of the Day
Word Value for
Words With Friends
Related Word
Nearby words for refutableFCC suspends review of Comcast/TWC and AT&#038;T/DirecTV mergers | Ars Technica
Content companies refused to grant access to confidential programming contracts.
The Federal Communications Commission today paused the "180-day informal time clock" in its review of the proposed Comcast/Time Warner Cable and AT&T/DirecTV .
The extension comes in response to a request by Dish N C Monumental Sports and E RCN; Grande Communications, Inc.; Choice Cable TV of Puerto R and Writers Guild of America, West. These organizations filed their request for an extension after content companies refused to allow access to confidential carriage agreements, despite the FCC issuing a
requiring limited disclosure. The content companies that objected to providing confidential information included CBS, Scripps, Disney, Time Warner, Twenty First Century Fox, Univision, Viacom, Discovery, and TV One.
Among other points, [the companies] argue that certain third-party programmers “do not want any of the interested parties’ outside counsel or experts to view [their programming contracts],” and have “set out to nullify” the Modified Joint Protective Order by filing multiple objections to requests for access. These commenters argue that the programming information is of particular importance in evaluating the applications at issue, and that “these issues cannot be joined, and that analysis cannot be conducted, without reasonable access by both the FCC and outside counsel and experts not involved in competitive decision-making.”
We agree with these commenters that their current inability to review Highly Confidential Information that has been submitted in these dockets significantly hampers their ability to meaningfully comment and participate in these proceedings, in both Docket 14-57 [Comcast/Time Warner Cable] and Docket 14-90 [AT&T/DirecTV]. Accordingly, we are suspending the pleading cycles and stopping our 180-day informal time clock in both dockets. After we rule on the objections, we will issue a Public Notice setting forth new pleading cycles that will provide sufficient time for commenters to review the relevant materials and prepare their comments.
Comcast issued a statement in response, saying that it is still confident that it will be able to buy TWC. "It is routine for the FCC to pause the review of significant transactions as it works to create a full record," Comcast said. "The Commission is working to hear the concerns of various parties. In the meantime, review of information and evidence already in the docket will continue. We are confident that the Commission will quickly resolve these issues while continuing its work so that review will be completed in early 2015."
/ Jon is Ars Technica's senior IT reporter, covering the FCC and broadband, telecommunications, wireless technology, and more.}