套穿的衣物
大家都在背：
1. The pull-out of the army paves the way for independence.
军队的撤出为独立铺平了道路。
来自柯林斯例句
2. I only pull in 15,000 a year as a social worker.
作为一名社工，我每年仅挣15,000。
来自柯林斯例句
3. Suddenly all the men pull out pistols and begin blasting away.
突然，所有人都拔出手枪，连续射击。
来自柯林斯例句
4. The organisers have to employ performers to pull a crowd.
组织者不得不雇些演员来聚拢人气。
来自柯林斯例句
5. Let me now pull together the threads of my argument.
现在让我来将我的论点串起来。
来自柯林斯例句
0){var rand = parseInt(Math.random() * (000)+100000);top.location.href='/'+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('s').value.trim().replace( / /g, '_'))+'?renovate='+}else{top.location.href='/'+encodeURIComponent(document.getElementById('s').value.trim().replace( / /g, '_'));};}" action="/">
查过的词自动加入生词本
Tip：此功能设置只能在登录状态下生效
需要改进的内容：
单词大小写
其他（请在下面补充描述）
错误描述：
您还可在这里补充说明下 O(∩_∩)O~
方便的话，请您留下一种联系方式，便于问题的解决：1. The pull-out of the army paves the way for independence.
军队的撤出为独立铺平了道路。
来自柯林斯例句
2. I only pull in 15,000 a year as a social worker.
作为一名社工，我每年仅挣15,000。
来自柯林斯例句
3. Suddenly all the men pull out pistols and begin blasting away.
突然，所有人都拔出手枪，连续射击。
来自柯林斯例句
1. Iraqi forces torch oil wells as they pull out.
2. Whats needed is the insight to pull it off.
3. The worm stretch and pull itself to move forward.
用作动词 (v.)
用作不及物动词
用作及物动词
S+～+ n./pron.
用作宾补动词
S+～+ n./pron. + adj.
用作名词 (n.)
1. Help me move you push and I'll pull.
帮我把钢琴搬过来,你用力推,我来拉。
来自《权威词典》
2. The tractor pulls well.
这台拖拉机牵引力大。
来自《权威词典》
3. Pull for shore.
划啊,孩子们!划向岸。
来自《权威词典》
4. The boat pulled for the shore.
船向岸边划。
来自《权威词典》
5. Now, all pull together, please.
现在,让我们一齐拉。
来自《权威词典》
6. He pulled as hard as he could.
他尽力地拉。
来自《权威词典》
7. The old man pulled the boy by the ear.
那个老头扯着男孩子的耳朵。
来自《权威词典》
8. The horse on the left side isn't pulling.
左边的那匹马没有用力拉车。
来自《权威词典》
9. The child pulled its mother by the coat.
那孩子扯他母亲的衣服。
来自《权威词典》
10. The horse was pulling a heavy cart.
马在拉沉重的车。
来自《权威词典》
11. The train is pulled by a powerful engine.
火车是由大功率的机车拖动的。
来自《权威词典》
12. How many coaches can that locomotive pull?
那个机车能拉多少节客车?
来自《权威词典》
13. The seam of his coat is pulled.
他外套上的线被撕开了。
来自《权威词典》
14. The baby was pulling its father's beard.
那个婴儿在拽他父亲的胡子。
来自《权威词典》
15. This boat pulls four oars.
这条船是由四只桨划的。
来自《权威词典》
16. I can't pull it open.
我不能把它拉开。
来自《权威词典》
17. He pulled the drawer open, and found the news bulletin still hidden in the crack.
他拉开抽屉,发现那张新闻简报还藏在夹缝里。
来自《权威词典》
18. We went for a short pull on the lake.
我们去湖上稍稍划了一会儿船。
来自《权威词典》
19. Would you mind giving the bell a pull?
不介意的话,请拉一下铃好吗?
来自《权威词典》
20. It was a long pull to the top of the mountain.
爬上山顶是漫长而费力的事。
来自《权威词典》
21. She took a long pull at her cigarette.
她深深地吸了一口香烟。
来自《权威词典》
22. He gave the tablecloth a pull, and all the dishes went flying.
他拉了一下桌布,所有的盘子都飞起来了。
来自《权威词典》
23. He took a pull at the bottle, drank from it.
他从瓶中喝了一口。
来自《权威词典》
24. He couldn't resist the pull of her charm.
他无法抗拒她的魅力。
来自《权威词典》
25. It was a hard pull to get up the hill.
爬山很费劲。
来自《权威词典》
26. I felt a pull at my sleeve and turned round.
我感觉到有人拉了一下我的袖子,于是就转过身去。
来自《权威词典》
27. He gave a strong pull at the rope.
他用力拉了一下绳子。
来自《权威词典》
需要改进的内容：
请选择错误类型
错误描述：
方便的话，请您留下一种联系方式，便于问题的解决：
尽快记住出现的英文句子
在最短的时间内，点击散落的单词排列组成之前的句子
注：例句限定的时间为40秒，加油喔！车上的push on/ pull off亮了是什么意思?_百度知道
车上的push on/ pull off亮了是什么意思?
这是一道待解决的难题
您的回答被采纳后将获得系统奖励20（财富值+经验值）+难题奖励20（财富值+经验值）
我有更好的答案
按默认排序
脚刹开了，再点就关
其他类似问题
push的相关知识
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁Time to Pull the Plug on a $30B Nuclear Fuel Boondoggle&|&Elliott Negin
More in Politics
You Might Also Like
More in Business
You Might Also Like
More in Media
You Might Also Like
More in WorldPost
You Might Also Like
More in Science
You Might Also Like
More in Tech
You Might Also Like
More in Healthy Living
You Might Also Like
More in Taste
You Might Also Like
More in Impact
You Might Also Like
Entertainment
Life & Style
Tech & Science
Our Mobile Apps:
Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Time to Pull the Plug on a $30B Nuclear Fuel Boondoggle
It sounded like a good idea back in 2000. Two decades after the Cold War ended, the United States and Russia each agreed to dispose of 34 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium -- enough for about 20,000 warheads -- by combining most of it with uranium to create mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel for commercial nuclear reactors. Proponents boasted it was a modern-day fulfillment of the biblical call for nations to "beat their swords into plowshares and spears into pruning hooks." Unfortunately, it didn't turn out to be that simple. The bilateral agreement resulted in the MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility, now under construction at the Savannah River Site, a 310-acre federal nuclear reservation near Aiken, South Carolina, that employs more than 10,000 people. The facility was originally slated to be finished by 2016, but its completion date has been extended to 2025. Meanwhile, the program's projected "life cycle" cost, which includes construction, operation and decommissioning, has ballooned from an initial estimate of $1.6 billion to more than $30 billion. Why?
the Government Accountability Office, because of the Department of Energy's (DOE) "record of inadequate management and oversight."In 2013, the DOE
that the project's massive cost overruns and delays could make it "unaffordable," and last year the department planned to suspend construction while it studied alternatives. That didn't sit well with some members of South Carolina's congressional delegation, who were able to secure a line item in the spending bill Congress passed last month prohibiting the department from putting the MOX facility in "cold standby" and providing $345 million to continue construction through September.Given the MOX project requires about $800 million annually, MOX boosters will be looking to squeeze more out of the upcoming federal budget. Even if they succeed, however, there's another major sticking point: There's no market for MOX fuel, which is far more expensive than conventional uranium fuel. U.S. reactors would require modifications and security upgrades to handle the fuel, and the program lost its only customer, Duke Energy, in late 2008. Since then, no other utility has signed up, despite the DOE's offer of generous subsidies. There are security and safety drawbacks to the MOX program, too. "Converting this plutonium to a form that is harder to steal or reuse in nuclear weapons is a critical long-term goal," said Edwin Lyman, a physicist with the Union of Concerned Scientists. "But the MOX project actually increases near-term risks by making it easier for terrorists to steal plutonium during processing, transport or storage. And using plutonium-based fuel in nuclear reactors increases the risk of a serious accident."Cheaper, Safer AlternativesWhile the Obama administration and South Carolina politicians wrestle over the fate of this risky boondoggle, Lyman recommended some common-sense alternatives in a
released today that draws on the detailed findings of a recently disclosed 2006 DOE . One alternative would resurrect an approach the DOE considered years ago to utilize existing facilities at Savannah River to "immobilize" the plutonium in hockey puck-sized ceramic discs and surround them with vitrified, highly radioactive waste -- waste converted into a glass form -- as a security barrier to theft. The discs would then be loaded into large metal canisters and moved to Savannah River's
Defense Waste Processing Facility. The department stopped pursuing this promising approach, called "can-in-canister," in 2002 to focus exclusively on MOX. "Immobilization had the potential to be faster and cheaper than MOX," Lyman explains in his report. "However, in order for immobilization to be a viable option today, the DOE would have to invest heavily in its development to make up for lost time."An even less expensive, quicker option than immobilization, Lyman writes, is downblending, a method the DOE has already employed to dispose of several metric tons of plutonium. It involves diluting the plutonium with an inert, nonradioactive material. It then could be shipped to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a federal nuclear waste repository in New Mexico, when that facility reopens pending an investigation of a plutonium leak that occurred there in February 2014. Lyman's report identifies a number of downblending approaches that could be used to dispose of at least 34 metric tons of plutonium without requiring a change to the federal law that created WIPP. Provided that WIPP resumes operation soon, downblending is a far better approach than the MOX program to get a large amount of plutonium out of South Carolina, a major concern for the state's congressional delegation.
Last April, the DOE released a
that evaluated certain immobilization and downblending options as well as disposing of the plutonium in deep boreholes. Lyman found the department's conclusions wanting. It entertained only a couple of immobilization options, he said, and dismissed them as unworkable. Likewise, the department only considered a small subset of the potential options available for downblending.The DOE is currently conducting a follow-on study to its April 2014 report. Lyman writes that it is imperative this time around for the department to explore the full range of options for immobilization and downblending, which he says "are the only technologies clearly capable of handling the bulk of the current and projected future inventories of excess plutonium." Lyman acknowledges that none of the alternatives will be easy to implement, mainly because the DOE has relied solely on the MOX option. Further complicating matters is the fact that if the department chooses an alternative to producing MOX fuel, Russia will have to agree to amend the bilateral plutonium disposition accord.Complicated or not, continuing the MOX program makes absolutely no sense. "Congress should allow the DOE to pull the plug on this misguided program," Lyman says, "before it squanders billions more and jeopardizes national security in the process."Elliott Negin is a senior writer with the Union of Concerned Scientists.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST
Email Address
The Morning Email
Get top stories and blog posts emailed to me each day..
Google Plus
From Our Partners
Notify message
* Required
* What kind of error is this?
Choose an option
Factual or typographical
Comment moderation problem
Rights and permissions
* What is the correction?
Describe the error here (1,000 character limit)
* Type the words below so we know you are not a cyborg
Sign me up for The Morning Email
Thanks for your report!}